<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>239</startPage>
    <endPage>248</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/239</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9574</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Exploratory study on accounting and taxation of virtual currencies by Romanian companies</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      As virtual currencies became more common and utilized
by various users, companies or individuals, the question
about if and how to tax for them could no longer be
ignored. The rise and fall of Bitcoin in the last year, the
increasing number of Initial Coin Offerings and the
growing number of virtual currencies being launched
recently, made everyone alert to the topic. This is why,
lately, more and more regulators chose to come up with
clarifications about how to account (and tax) for virtual
currencies. Romania, unfortunately, is not one of those
countries that chose to adapt their legislation to take into
account virtual coins. Ambiguity governs the use of
virtual currencies, their nature and the rules to account
for transactions involving virtual currencies.
In this paper, we analyze the difficulties faced by the
corporate entities which use virtual currencies in their
activity and so have to pay corporate tax.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9574.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>Virtual currency</keyword>
      <keyword>Bitcoin</keyword>
      <keyword>accounting and
reporting</keyword>
      <keyword>taxation</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>249</startPage>
    <endPage>260</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/249</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9575</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">New tendencies in audit reporting, examples of good practices BVB</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      The study presents relevant aspects regarding the
evolution of the audit reporting after the economic
recession. The motivation of the author to tackle this
topic about the new tendencies in audit reporting was
the actuality and importance granted to the new
extended audit report. Thus, at the level of the speciality
literature, a variety of studies on the evolution of the
reporting in audit and the role it has were analysed.
Following the conceptual delimitation and the
presentation of the speciality literature’s study, the
author undertook empirical research which targeted the
amendments made to the audit report for the years 2015
respectively 2016. The result of this analysis shows that
the majority of the entities listed on the stock exchange
have respected the new structure of the audit report for
the year 2016.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9575.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>Reporting in audit</keyword>
      <keyword>Big 4</keyword>
      <keyword>key matters of
audit</keyword>
      <keyword>audit opinion</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>261</startPage>
    <endPage>269</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/261</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9576</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Auditor's Liability and Methods for its Limitation</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      The liability of the financial auditor has to be treated
distinctively based on his relationship with the audited
entity: internal auditor or external auditor. The logic
behind this aspect results from the fact that, based on its
relationship with the audited company, the liability has its
source either in the Labour law, in what concerns the
internal auditor, or it is a contractual liability, in case of
the external auditor, even in the situation when this
engages in internal auditing work through a contract. In
both cases, the sanctions applied by the professional
bodies to which they belong are applicable. The liability
of the financial auditor is distinguished in categories as
disciplinary, administrative, civil and criminal, the
auditors having at their disposal methods to limit the
liability, methods that will be displayed in the paper.
This paper is concerned with the liabilities that the
financial auditors can have, distinguished based on
whether they are internal or external to the audited
company, using in the analysis of the topic the method
of deduction and induction, starting from the content
analysis of the legislation and regulations in force. The
role of this article is not only to present the situations
which can attract the liability of the financial auditors and
the types of liabilities, but also to support them with a
presentation of and methods for limiting the liability,
determined with the help of an analysis of these
liabilities, and to protect them from a professional point
of view.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9576.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>Financial auditor</keyword>
      <keyword>liability</keyword>
      <keyword>conditions of
liability</keyword>
      <keyword>conditions of liability of the internal auditor</keyword>
      <keyword>
conditions of liability of the external auditor</keyword>
      <keyword>limitations of
liability.</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>270</startPage>
    <endPage>277</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/270</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9577</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Internal control systems in the European Union Member</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      Most EU Member States have initiated reforms to
improve public sector management by introducing and
promoting the public internal control system focusing on
the implementation of core principles on an
internationally recognized internal control model. In most
countries in the European Union, national control
systems are based on the COSO and INTOSAI models.
The paper aims to provide a radiography of good
practices regarding the implementation of internal
control systems in the countries of the European Union
for the implementation of healthy financial management
as an integral part of good governance, both from the
perspective of historical evolution and the current
situation.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9577.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>Internal control</keyword>
      <keyword>European Union</keyword>
      <keyword>
governance</keyword>
      <keyword>transparency</keyword>
      <keyword>COSO</keyword>
      <keyword>INTOSAI</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>278</startPage>
    <endPage>284</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/278</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9578</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Malaysia’s SMEs credit industry: CSR taxanomy activities</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      This paper studies the CSR taxonomy of customer
satisfaction and their trust and loyalty activities to the
local SMEs credit and lending industry in Malaysia. The
data was collected from 365 customers based on
convenience sampling and data analysed using
structural equation modelling. The results show that all
the items (customer satisfaction, trust and loyalty
construct) have high factor loadings (0.7) and the
composite reliability of all the construct is acceptable
(around 0.8) CAR. This paper also reaffirms that quality
services which satisfy customer, increase bank image,
and customer trust and loyalty. The findings of this study
are to investigate credit firms’ managers to decide upon
resource allocation and planning for their future service
in order to enhance their customers’ satisfaction and
loyalty. Satisfied customers are the ones who will
continue using service and will not change to the other
banks or they will be loyal and will recommend the credit
firms to others. Therefore managers should think about
constant improvement of quality services, which meet
the expectations of customers.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9578.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>CSR</keyword>
      <keyword>customer satisfaction</keyword>
      <keyword>image</keyword>
      <keyword>loyalty</keyword>
      <keyword>
structural equation modelling</keyword>
      <keyword>trust.</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>285</startPage>
    <endPage>292</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/285</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9579</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Improving information - a necessity in substantiating the accounting decision</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      As regards the decision-making process, there are two
general principles accepted in decision-making: 1) the
decision is made in terms of gain-loss; 2) a decision
depends on the context; even if the decision-making
rules are known, the context of the decision may be
different, which means that the meaning of the concepts
involved in the decision-making rules changes.
The article attempts to introduce the idea that the
specification of rules and constraints of concept use
should be part of the level of knowledge modeling on the
principle of data level separation of the logical level of
the application. Specifying constraints at the place and
time of manifestation of their knowledge characterizes
the context and adapts the decision model. The article
addresses the issue of interest and presents examples
of accounting.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9579.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>accounting decision</keyword>
      <keyword>pieces of knowledge</keyword>
      <keyword>
information</keyword>
      <keyword>knowledge</keyword>
      <keyword>rules</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania  </publisher>
    <journalTitle>Audit Financiar</journalTitle>
    <issn>18448801</issn>
    <publicationDate>2018-02-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <issue>150</issue>
    <startPage>293</startPage>
    <endPage>300</endPage>
    <doi>10.20869/AUDITF/2018/150/293</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>9580</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">The auditor’s role in the context of the accounting regulations evolution</title>
    <authors>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">
      The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the
importance of the auditors ‘role in validating the
appropriate application of the International Financial
Reporting Standards as a result of numerous changes
and the complex situations from day to day, from the
perspective of choosing the right method, respectively
from the perspective of verifying compliance with these
standards.
The harmonization of the provided information facilitates
the comparison in time and between companies,
ensuring consistency a more granular discipline in
reflecting the economic transactions.
The aim is to achieve the harmonization of the
accounting methods and principles by adopting the
same set of Accounting Standards. Having the
normalization process as a starting point, the
harmonization can be achieved through a convergence
process built by gathering all the useful and constructive
information from the past experiences. The main
objectives are to use the same language and to quantify
the impact of change using the same set of tools. The
distinctive element relates to the culture of each
organization, but the way in which the financial
statements are prepared and the way in which they are
presented will remain the same if the full harmonization
is achieved.
Most of the time, the auditor has to assess the impact of
an accounting selection at the expense of another option
and to decide whether the results obtained, respectively
the information provided by the entity are accurate and
do not include misstatements that could significantly
affect the financial statements.
The selection process involves evaluating the results
compared to the objectives set by the regulatory system.
The role of the auditor is to assess the degree of
compliance of the financial statements with an
applicable financial reporting framework. The auditor's
objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance that the
financial statements taken as a whole are free from
material misstatements which may be caused by error or
fraud and to issue an audit report that includes the audit
opinion. The auditor’s integrity and objectivity are directly related to the freedom from any constraint, which could
affect the expression of the audit opinion. In other words,
the auditor should never be affected by the influences
that might compromise the professional judgment.
The speed of the changes from accounting may
compromise the way in which the professional judgment
is applied due to the complexity of certain cases. The
International Auditing Standards provide the following
guideline: when the auditor is no longer in a position to
evaluate a case, a specialist/ expert may be contracted.
The loss of independence occurs when the auditor is
influenced by the client to "overlook" certain deviations
from the provisions of the International Financial
Reporting Standards.
The evolution of the accounting standards directly
impacts the auditor's activity, as it is also shown in the
study presented below. The results obtained can be
extrapolated as the study focuses on a research related
to the quantification of the impact of regulatory
developments on the auditor's work.
    </abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">
      http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9580.pdf
    </fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>the evolution of the regulations</keyword>
      <keyword>principles
based accounting</keyword>
      <keyword>fair value presentation</keyword>
      <keyword>financial
reporting</keyword>
      <keyword>and financial statements.</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>
